
Beginner
Basics >
e-Learning:
Bridging the Apathy Gap
by
Martin McInnes
Evangelists
and Customers
You are a convert to e-learning aren't you? An evangelist
for its power and a true believer that not only is learning
fun it can also be 'sexy'. If you didn't feel this way why
would you be suggesting to your bosses that the company invest
hundreds of thousands, even millions, of pounds, dollars or
Euros in setting up an e-learning programme?
On the surface it seems pretty straight forward, IT provides
the bandwidth, the e-learning providers get your launch programmes
on-line, you send out an e-mail, conduct a few seminars for
department heads, even put some posters up. What's left to
do? Just sit back and wait for the customers to come of course.
But they don't. Then reality dawns, learning simply isn't
sexy or fun outside your own project team and unless pushed
very hard and given an appropriate context it hardly seems
relevant to the majority of employees.
Sure, there will always been those users who, either through
inclination or ambition, embrace it, but the promise of e-learning
has always been 'more learning for less'. The point is that
you have embarked upon this course to broaden the appeal of
and therefore the personal and organizational benefit that
learning can deliver, whilst still achieving cost savings.
You are at a very high risk of failing against these objectives
unless you accept the disciplines of change management and
the role that communication plays when it comes to making
e-learning deliver.
Senior Managers and the Average Jo
Certainly we can all take some comfort in the fact that our
post industrial society is waking up to the fact that helping
individuals realize their potential is not just a good way
of recruiting, retaining and motivating the best people around,
it is likely to be the differentiating factor in the competitive
strength of a corporation. Great theory, undoubtedly true
and music to the ears of Learning and Development departments,
and this is exactly where the problem lies.
In the white heat of new learning technology everyone seems
to forget that to the average Jo who does the real work, learning
is still a low priority. So, we have a big perception gap
- an often apathetic target audience for whom training is
perceived as more of a burden than a liberation and a small
group of senior corporate managers who see it as a holy grail.
Learner Attitudes
Herewith a few examples of the sort of attitudes towards e-learning
'real' people have that should be reflected in your communication
messages - these are quotes from focus groups we have conducted
and around which campaigns/messages can be formed, they may
not be universally applicable therefore, but hold some common
truths;
Reasons not to:
- "I'm doing OK anyway"
- "Too busy - can hardly get my work done let alone
find time for learning"
- "When I finish work the last thing I want is some
boring learning course"
- "My line manager makes enough of a fuss when I read
an industry mag let alone learning"
- "Its not 'cool'"
- "Puts a burden on my colleagues to take up my work-load"
- "It's more work for no more money - typical of management"
- "latest management buzz word"
Reasons in favour:
- "good for my career, it improves my marketability"
- "makes meeting the personal development bit of my
quarterly review easy"
- "good to step away from the routine for an hour or
two a week"
- "it's free and it's easy"
- "being able to do it 15 minute chunks is the best
bit"
Areas of concern:
- "best bit of learning is learning with others, e-learning
doesn't let this happen"
- "Your get a lot of learning through anecdotes of
others this will be all theory and text"
- "You need to be very self motivated, I'm not"
- "Sounds complicated"
- "I used to really look forward to the 2 day residential
- got me away from the kids"
None of the above answers are surprising, and there are of
course many more so one would imagine that developing a communications
plan and messages that tackle these issues should be fairly
straightforward. Well it is, but why then do internal comms
teams often do little more than produce is a dry list of courses
that don't talk about what the benefit is to the individual.
Consumer focused communications
The communication challenge lies firstly in reaching agreement
at senior management level that innovative or at least benefit
led and 'consumer' focused communications methods are vital
to bridge this perception gap and, secondly that it is only
by taking a very consistent and integrated approach in changing
attitudes and approaches towards learning can deliver the
results you want.
It's not that no-one tackles the e-learning communication
issue with such imagination, it's just that it's very rare
and that such activity tends to be limited to short lived
initiatives centred round the launch phase which simply isn't
enough. Such limited activity is simply being tasked with
solving too many deeply ingrained attitudes, likely to include
traces of indifference/apathy/cynicism when it comes to learning
(if these characteristics weren't there why would an innovative
idea be needed in the first place?).
The most forward-looking corporations (and those who have
already seen their e-learning pilot programmes fail or be
compromised) have gone back to basics when it comes to the
launch and on-going promotion of e-learning. They realise
that to affect the changes in attitude necessary that they
need to approach their target audience as intelligent consumers
rather than a block of employees.
It's a big mental step and organisationally can lead to quite
a few conflicts - it demands quite a few home truths being
told/accepted about the poverty of imagination and lack of
'consumer' focus when it comes to internal communications
in general and learning in particular.
If at this point you are protesting violently at such a generalisation,
take a look at your company newsletter/magazine and ask yourself
how many of your colleagues would actually pay money for it?
Not Many? The reasons are obvious. The subject matter describes
rather than inspires and the headlines are about as far from
promising a compelling read as it's possible to get. In short
the editors and contributors have not written with an audience
of 'real' people in mind, do not really talk about their issues,
concerns and news and hence do not engage them.
So far we have talked almost exclusively about the agenda
as it concerns the end user. The communications agenda extends
beyond the simple promotion of e-learning programmes to prospective
participants however, it also needs to convert the HR teams,
Line Managers and Top Management. The compelling presentation
material and documentary proof that e-learning represents
a highly relevant and very valuable contribution to the achievement
of corporate strategy is vital. These groups may contain a
high proportion of cynics resistant for any number of reasons
to the concept of e-learning and you rely on their support,
particularly when things aren't going so well, to ensure long-term
funding.
Communication itself is of course itself only part of the
picture. The imperatives behind learning in general and e-learning
in particular must also be woven into the fabric of the organisation.
Some learning should be a mandatory requirement built into
review procedures, even non-mandatory aspects of personal
development should play a role in quarterly or annual reviews
and through such mechanisms we provide both the pull and the
push factors that are more likely to result in a high uptake
by employees of a new way of learning. Of course we aren't
going to convert every die hard anti-learner but we are likely
to convert a higher proportion of our marginal/middle audience
and it is on this audience that the battle ground of cost
benefit is won and on which the personal glory of you the
reader will rely.
Martin McInnes is Managing Director of 5
Communication, a UK based communications consultancy dealing
predominately with consumer brand owners. Internal communications
is however a significant part of the agency's business whose
currrent and past clients include Barclays Bank, ALSTOM, GEC
Marconi and British Aerospace.
|