|
Subscribe FREE to the monthly
e-Learning Guru newsletter!
Sample Issue #1
Sample Issue #2
I
value your privacy. I will never rent or sell
your e-mail address. You can always unsubscribe
with one-click.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
What
Will 2004 Bring?
by
Kevin Kruse
No self-respecting columnist could pass up the opportunity
to use a January issue to pontificate about the year ahead,
and I'm no different. But as I gaze into my crystal ball,
I see a lot of the same themes now that I did a year ago.
That's probably a good thing given the weak market, lack of
vendor R&D spending and continued state of buyer confusion.
But none-the-less here is a briefing that will get you ready
for the year ahead, or at the very least, will make you popular
around the water cooler conversation.
Industry Consolidation Continues
Last January we saw Microsoft acquire Placeware and by the
fourth quarter we were inundated with TV advertisements for
the "new" Microsoft Office Live Meeting. Throughout
that time many LMS companies continued their struggle towards
illusive profits and many content companies - most notably
CognitiveArts - were sold to stronger competitors. 2004 will
bring more Darwinian times as the strong get stronger and
the weak disappear. Advice to CLOs: make sure your financial
due diligence is up to date on your key suppliers and escrow
the source code of your critical applications.
Off-shore E-Learning Development Becomes Common
With new demands for cost cutting and a high-speed global
network in place, off-shoring white collar jobs to lower-wage
countries has become a hot topic in executive circles. This
job shift is impacting architects, radiologists, software
engineers, call center professionals, and, yes, e-learning
developers. Five years ago vendors and training executives
alike dismissed off-shore development over perceptions of
quality and management problems. Today, many 20-person content
developers have off-shore partnerships in place and e-learning
RFP's now routinely solicit services from companies in India,
Ireland, and elsewhere. Advice to CLOs: keep and open mind
and read "The New Global Job Shift" from the Feb
3, 2003 issue of Business Week.
Instructional Design gets worse (but cheaper)
Death by PowerPoint is becoming even more common as it gets
easier and cheaper to create and deliver talking slideshows
with limited interactivity over the Internet. Sending your
workshop content to e-learning developers in India will in
some cases produce asynchronous online training for as little
$5,000 per finished hour, and a variety of tools are now available
that enable subject matter experts to convert their PowerPoint
presentations into narrated online modules. Advice to CLOs:
don't confuse information with instruction. Show and tell
definitely has its place in the toolbox for performance improvement,
but don't let it be the only tool you use.
Instructional Design gets better (but more expensive)
Think simulations. Almost a corollary to the trend above,
the industry will begin to value the difference between tell-and-test
design models and often more effective, but costly, simulations
and instructional games. When lives are on the line simulations
have long been a staple in the training curriculum (e.g.,
training commercial pilots, or military personnel). Advice
to CLOs: read Simulations and the Future of Learning
by Clark Aldrich and spend an afternoon with your teenager
playing PlayStation® 2.
M-Learning (i.e., mobile learning)
I hate the phrase (who needs more jargon and differentiation
at a time like this?) but it's the term now used to describe
e-learning designed for those on the go. Though the term itself
has been around for a few years now, it is only recently that
the reality has begun to catch up to the hype as with the
introduction of smaller and more powerful computer devices
(e.g., Pocket PCs, Tablet PCs, web-enabled phones) and the
rapid spread of wireless access points (Bluetooth, WiFi and
3G). Advice to CLOs: invest $150 and 4 hours on a Saturday
to install a WiFi network in your home; see how it changes
how you use the Internet.
Workflow-based E-Learning
E-learning will get smaller, timelier and more perishable.
The first wave of e-learning consisted of a lot of big, static
catalogs. We bought it, nobody came. Now the attention is
finally shifting to job performance where it belongs. The
characteristics of workflow e-learning include the real-time
access to information, tutorials, tools or other knowledge
objects, truly at the time and place of need. With advances
in mobile technologies (see above) instructional design methods
need to shift toward rapid-authoring of bite size modules.
Advice to CLOs: shadow your mobile workers for a few days
and see where they get stuck. Look for opportunities for task
support not knowledge transfer.
All of these topics live on different phases of the technology
hype cycle and will no doubt be replaced before year's end
with the new "new thing." The most valuable advice
I have to offer to CLOs is: don't follow trends or listen
to guru's too closely. If you keep your focus on the business
challenge and the learner, then the design and technology
will follow from there.
Kevin
Kruse is the e-learning columnist for CLO, Chief Learning
Officer magazine, author of Technology-based Training
(Jossey-Bass), and President of AXIOM Professional Health
Learning. He can be reached at kkruse@e-learningguru.com
|
 |
|